2.

Avoidance of inadvertent contamination of populatkd
islands or transient shipping

3.

A rapid evaluation of the relationship between fofecast and actual cloud travel utilizing aerial tra€king of the fallout radiation cloud.

Initial radsafe planning was based on the limited Pacific] Proving
Ground

(PPG)

experience.

Only ll nuclear tests had occurred

In the Pa-

cific and of these only 2, during Operation IVY, were large-y eld devices.
The IVY experience did not indicate the widespread radiologic 1 contamination that could be caused by a large-yield weapon.

BRAVO, th@

nation in Operation CASTLE, contaminated the shot islands to

first deto-

fhe extent

that one observer concluded "Operation CASTLE must be reporte
nightmare of radiological safety test operations"

(Reference

as the
7,

Pp.

6).*

Nevertheless, the organization and planning proved flexible eough to
accommodate even this unanticipated major radiological contam: nation and
the additional precautionary measures and monitoring efforts
sarily ensued.

hat neces-

No personnel were allowed to live on any part of Bikini

Atoll throughout the remainder of the test series, but were h used at
Enewetak and aboard the task force ships.

Access to the Biki i Atoll was

restricted to those with official duties, and lengths of visi

S

were

controlled.

The radsafe planning and safety criteria used by CJTF 7 a dad the task
units, as they evolved to meet the objectives of CUJTF 7 durin

the opera-

tion, are the subject of this chapter.

RADSAFE PLANNING
Radiological safety was a major joint task force concern during the
planning and operational phases of the CASTLE tests.

Origina!

planning

* The author of this comment, after an additional 25 years exferience in
the field of radiation protection, no longer holds this viey, but rather
states that the radiological safety problems of CASTLE presqnted a challenge in protecting the 17,000 task force personnel that wag admirably
met (Reference 18).
75
ST

Select target paragraph3