Soil 32 Cleanup Planning FOLLOW-ON ACTIONS The Director, would be DNA announced that the conference would 6 d to record the issues, decisions, and rationale, and that copie forwarded to all concerned.!29 Follow-on actions were t incNA would develop an Environmental Assessment coverin; decisions made at this conference which deviated from the publishec EIS, and circulate it to DOE, DOI, and MLSC for comment an advice as to the need of an EIS supplement. _DNA would request DOEto have the Bair Committee reexamineit: the conference. criteria based upon decisions made at ia DNA, working through DOE, would obtain assistancee ofthespec bes rmin dete and t Cryp on experts to examine the Aom methods for excising. DNA, working with DOE, would devise a plan for a plowing experiment that would permit determination of engineering practicality and radiological effectiveness. é. DNA would report these changes to the JCS, Secretary of Defense, and Congressional committees, as appropriate. !30 The conference provided the opportunity to develop decisions relative to two questions necessary to the commencingofsoil cleanup operations: 1.2. in what priority would the islands be cleaned and in accordance witt what cleanup criteria. Priority would be placed on the cleanup of Aomor and Enjebi, with the cleanup of contaminatedsoil over 160 pCi/g on Runi being accomplished concurrently as resources becameavailable from othe: activities. The cleanup would be based on the newcriteria recommendec by the Bair Committee; i.e., 40/80/160 pCi/g for residential, agricultural and food-gathering use. The conference also served to increase the awareness Of al! participants that certain unknownsstill existed and some problems werestill unresolved, but these would be handled while the soi cleanup operations were underway.