responsibilities for
results were agreements on planning actions and basic
the cleanup and rehabilitation efforts as follows:
, the monitoring
@ DOD would fund the precleanup engineering survey
to insure the
and
ions
operat
p
cleanu
t
suppor
and surveys required to
the actual
and
p;
cleanu
the
in
ed
involv
safety of personnel

ee
eee ee

RADIOLOGICAL CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK ATOLL

~~

68

t Manager.26 The forma
that the Director, DNA be designated as Projec
mber 1972. It contained
Nove
30
on
designation was made by the JCS

Secretary of Defense,
specific guidance and authorizations from the
of Defense in planning
tary
Secre
the
including: (1) authorization to act for
ding

ing the project, inclu
and—if approval was granted—in accomplish
t of agreements with
opmen
devel
and
ies
direct liaison with other agenc
the Chairman, JCS informed
them; (2) direction to keep the Secretary and
of the project, specifically
throughout the planning and execution

rt; (3) tasking on
including any requirements for military service suppo
(EIS), and (4)
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement
up

or executing the clean
guidance to not commit the DOD to financing
ed.2? Formal funding
project until further funding guidance was receiv
gement and Budget
Mana
of
the Office

guidance was not received from
(OMB) until October 1973, almost a year later.28

conduct and support of
DNAand AECformalized the agreement on the
mber 1972, about 2
Dece
8
on
ys
the radiological and engineering surve

months after the surveys began.

ENEWETAK ENGINEERING SURVEY:
OCTOBER 1972-APRIL 1973
to conduct the
DNA contracted with Holmes & Narver, Inc. (HI&N)

in an
engineering survey of Enewetak Atoll and provide the results

and cost estimates for
engineering study, t o include recommendations

_

© DOI would fund the rehabilitation work.?°

formally advised the
On 14 November 1972, the Secretary of [Defense
up and requested
clean
for
ties
sibili
Chairman of the JCS of DOD’s respon
l

69

cleanup of the atoll. H&N was selected because of their long experience in
providing technical and logistics support at Enewetak during the nuclear
test period and because the firm had a large repository of data and maps
pertinent to the locations and effects of the tests.2?
The Enewetak Engineering Survey began on 12 October 1972. Field work

the AEC radiological survey team. They used motor launches for
transportation across the lagoon and rubber rafts to travel from the
launches across the shallow reefs to most of the islands. The H&N teams’
first effort on each island was to locate the buildings and other facilities
shown on maps from the nuclear testing era. Then they recorded each object's present condition and their recommendations for its disposition.
When all previously recorded objects had been accountedfor, each island
was resurveyed to assure that any other hazardous objects had been
located and recorded for the survey report. Vegetation was so dense on
some islands that it prevented a thorough search for hazardous objects. On

Enewetak; any
@ AEC would fund the precleanup radiological survey of
gical exposure
other survey activities required to understand radiolo
ic radiological
of the people and development of standards; and period
subsequent
any
for
surveys after cleanup. DOD would reimburse
p.
cleanu
of
t
suppor
AECfield and/or laboratory work done in

of supporting paperwork.
DNAand AECdid not wait for the completion
in October 1972 while
ys
surve
eanup
Both organizations began their precl
developed.
being
were
ents
formal agreements and tasking docum

Planning and Programming

was accomplished by three two-man teams working in conjunction with

radiological and nonradiological cleanup efforts.

a ee er

4

islands where radiological contamination was suspected, the AEC

radiological survey personnel checked each object for contamination.
Readings were marked on the Engineering Survey maps. Material which
showed radiation measurements greater than measurements of local

background was shown as contaminated.29

The surveys were severely hampered by adverse weather. Heavy sea
conditions prevented actual survey of Boken (Irwin) and Ribewon
(James) Islands; however, they had been adequately covered by the May
1972 survey. Typhoon Olga struck the atoll on 23 October 1972, and the
Commanding General, SAMTEC, ordered an air evacuation of all
personne! to Kwajalein Missile Range. Little time was givento protect the
base camp from the effects of the tvphoon, and several facilities were
severely damaged. After the return to the atoll, AEC-NV had two turbine
generators from the Nevada Test Site flown in to restore power for
essential life-support facilities. Engineering Survey fteld work resumed on
8 November and was completed on 21 December 1972. Results of the
survey, together with some data from the AEC Radiological Survey, were

published in April 1973 as the Engineering Study for a Cleanup Plan.3!

The Engineering Study contained the results of the field survey and

conceptual plans for accomplishing the cleanup project using a commercial
contractor or, as an alternative, using military forces. It was published in
three volumes.

Volume | showed the results of the island-by-island site survey, with

aerial photographs of each island and a listing of all structures, other
construction, and major debris on each. The condition of each item was

indicated, along with a recommended disposition; e.g., remove, leave as
is,

make safe, or rehabilitate.

Each recommendation was based on

Select target paragraph3