ah

mH

Q 08

o
oo

Pop. ave. dose (cSv)

1

2

{

2
oO
>

¢ ost
®

2 0.4}

0.4

&

z 0.2
E

0.2
°

=

5

1

86

20

283

°

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Population average 30-y

Cumulative exposure time (y)

0.8

1

(cSv)

Figure 21. Population-average expected dose

from hypothetical residence on Rongelap Island

starting in 1995 (middle curve) and corresponding
two-tail 95% confidence limits on uncertainty in
population-average dose, as a function of
residence time.

2
w®&

SS
®

Cumulative probability

10

18

20

2

30

Cumulative exposure time (y)

Figure 22. Two-tail 95% confidence limits on

“uncertainty in population-average dose from
hypothetical residence on Rongelap Island
starting in 1995 as ratios of the corresponding
expected value of this dose (horizontal line) at specified residence times.

o

ao

5

ho

sos
~~

in

Dose/(Expected dose)

~—h

cSv and 50th, 95th and 99th perce
0.56, 0.84 and 1.0 cSv, respectively.

025 05 0.75

1

#125 15

Population average lifetime dibse

1.75

2

(cSv)

Figure 24. Estimated distribution uncertainty
in population-average lifejime dose
corresponding to hypothetical resifience of 500
people on Rongelap Island s
g in 1995,

assuming 40% incur a 70-y exposure {i.e.,

commencing at birth) and 60%

exposure. This distribution has a

incur a 30-y

and 50th

and 95th percentile values of 0.45,0.36 and 1.0
cSv, respectively.

Select target paragraph3