nat as

in which z is a single energy deposition

the

(TCV) of

-yputtous

the cell,

t.e.,

hit and exposed cells,

number of

the “cell dose";

respectively,

in

the

Ny and Np are

and F is

receiving an energy deposit during exposure E,

tion

target-containing volume

the

the number of

probability of 4 cell TCV

equal numerically

to

Ny/ Np

shaped

However,

tt is well known from physics

thac,

oilp

onse 45 4

F = Or

iLtiplied by

= 27,

(2)

c
r
quanticative

in which 0 is the field strength measured as fluence race (units of

ced endpolntss

particles em72 tt), which expresses

sure enat wiht

energy-conveying charged particles;

tp is

the expnsure

time;

4 is

fluence to which the total exposure is numerically equal; and

ally is much

“cross section”, or constant of proportionality.

simply

@

to the

the

is the

Thus, substituting in

Eq. (1), from Eq. (2),

isk tiwt 4

D

also, with
ntal

= 207,

(3)

in which z = k because, with stochastic energy deposition, and LLE, the
expectation value of

the mean cell dose is invariant with exposure.

Eq. (1) confirms that stated above, namely that D to the organ system

ze been put
at of

the rate of exposure (of cells)

ts not a dose to the cell, and that {ts equivalent is required for the

the

level of Diological organization, the cell, that is appropriate to the
“late single-cell initiated effects” of LLE, mutagenesis and
carcinogenesis.

ements »

it is

sorbed dose tO:
syste.

This

population,

D conceptually becomes the exposure of the cell

to which Ry/Ne is proportional,

that is to say,

“object-orlented quantity” Nase, as seen in Eq. (3), is proportional
to

the primary independent “field-oriented” varlable the exposure E, for

which 6 can be used as a parameter.

|

With D becoming $ conceptually, a rational basis
-\
--

Sy

Je

E

sT*,

the

“linear-non-threshold” relationship is provided.

for tie

Although frou

toxicvlogical priaciples a purported linear relationship between dose and
the probability of a quantal response tends

to defy credulity,

such a

relationship between exposure E and the number of (stochastically) dosed

individuals, or of those showing a quantal response is quite reasonable.

-211-

501241

Select target paragraph3