36

-

Table 22
Mean RBC, Hemoglobin, MCH, and Reticulocyte Levels by Age and Sex, 1959
.

Rongelap exposed

RBC (X10),

Hepb., g,

Males age 5-15

4.45+0.5* (10) **

Females

4.21+0.4 (31)

>15
>5

Males age 5-15
Females

215
>5

MCH,upg,

Males age 5-15
>15
Females
>5

Retic., %,

Males age 5-15

>15
Females >5

Ailingnae exposed
4.46

4.71+0.4 (19)

Rongelap contro]

(2)

4.6 +0.5 (22)

4.31+0.36 (9)

4.4 +04 (53)

5.15

(4)

12.3 +05 (10)

12.2

15.4
(4)
13.2 +0.87 (9)

14.8 +1.8 (44)
12.9 +#2.1 (52)

28.0 +3.3 (10)
30.8 +2.5 (19)
29.8 *+3.3 (31)

27.7
(2)
30.0
(4)
30.5 +1.9 (9)

28.5 *+1.9 (22)
30.7 +3.4 (44)
29.4 +2.7 (52)

14.4 41.3 (19)
12.5 +£0.95 (31)

0.13

0.31
0.21

( 9)

0.05

(15)
(23)

0.3
0.17

*Standard deviation.

**The numbers in parenthese are the numbers of people in the groups.

The explanationIs not clear. However, it was felt
that the erythrocyte counts done on the Coulter
electronic counter, and the hemoglobin andreticulocyte counts, were sufficient indices for evalua-

tion of erythropoetic function,
Erythrocytes and Hemoglobins.
The mean
levels of erythrocytes and hemoglobins (Table 22)
were generally somewhat belowthose accepted as

average for Americans and were only slightly
lower in the exposed Rongelap population than in

the unexposed group. Scattergrams (Figures 42
and 43) of the individual red cell counts plotted
by age for exposed people of both sexes show more
of the counts belowthe average level of the unexposed group than above it, and a plot of percent-

(2)

4.8 +0.5 (44)

(2)

(4)
(7)

13.) 41.1 (22)

0.29

043
0.41

(17)

(42)
(48)

DOE ARCHIVES

the left, which indicates a slight tendency toward

microcytosis.

Serum fron. Serum iron levels were <100 pg/
100 ml! serum in only5 persons, all unexposed.
Serum Protein. Serum protein levels in 1959
were again higher than normal in many cases.
The range in the exposed group was 6.6 to 8.4 g
with a meanof 7.45, and in the unexposed group
from 6.6 to 9.0 g with a mean of7.55.
Comments. The peripheral levels of blood elements have shown considerable fluctuation from
year to year. The explanationis not known. One

Ailingnae Blood Counts. Counts in the Ailingnae people (a group of 15 who had received an
estimated 69 r from fallout) are summarized in
‘Fables 21 and 22 and in Appendix 2, andthe individual counts are shown in Appendices 3 and 4.
These counts generally averaged slightly higher
than in the exposed Rongelap people but lower

might speculate that, since upper respiratory and
gastrointestinal infections are common,the temporal relationship of the hematological examinations
to periods of bacterial infection might stronglyinfluence the general level of certain elements, particularly the leukocytes. It is not known whether
the drop in 1960 leukocyte levels was so influenced. As pointed out, the influenza epidemicin
early 1960 apparently spared Rongelap Atoll.
Since hematological examinations were not done
on the unexposed group in 1960, it was not possible to evaluate exposed levels with relation to
radiationeffects.

Price-Jones Curves. Price-Jones curvesfor determination of red cell size distribution on 17
Rongelap people (exposed and unexposed) were
averaged and compared with an averaged curve
for 53 Americans of the same age group (Figure
45). The Marshallese curveis displaced slightlyto

sure that showed slightly lower levels in the exposed group werethe platelets and erythrocytes.
Erythrocyte counts had not been done before
1959. Re-examinationof earlier hematocritlevels
by construction of scattergrams and cumulative
distribution curves showed a slight tendencyfor

age cumulative distribution of counts (Figure 44)

shows the curve for the exposed group distinctly
displaced to the left.

than in the unexposed people.

ae eee

The only blood elements at 5 years post expo-

Select target paragraph3