( (~ . aos -29- Mr. Murphree and Dr.. McMillan both urged that the sodium-heterogeneous approach should not be neglected, Dr. Rabi suggested the Committee not make a recommendation on this at present. He suggested that the - report ask for detailed information, to be supplied by Commission staff, on the possibility of a program along this line. p. 19.) (Appendix D, The desirability of a six-month review of the fluid fuel approach was again brought out. | (Appendix D, p. 16.) Dr. Rabi suggested that the report of the Reactor Subcommittee be adopted as a report of the entire GAC. Dr. Warner moved that this report, as amended and revised in the light of the discussion, be adopted as a report of the full Committee. Mr. Murphree ‘seconded the motion, and the motion was unanimously carried. een ee ae ele. item 1; and Appendix D.) ReSeerotary!s Note: Future Agenda Items (Appendix B, Two definite suggestions in this report will give rise to future agenda items: . (1) The suggestion, p. 16, Appendix D, that a thorough review of the fluid fuel ANP program of Oak Ridge and Pratt & Whitney, directed toward a decision to continue or to modify the approach, be held in about six months —- i.e., in May 1955. (2) The suggestion, p. 19, Appendix D, that the Reactor Division draft a proposed program on the sodium cooled heterogeneous ANP reactor, including type and scope of work and contractors, which can be presented at the next meeting of the General Advisory Committee.) =e | 4‘2D Dy & “Og, %2 8 Or ro 3 TV