163

Acute and chronic intakes of fallout radionuclides @ S. L. SIMoNn ET AL.

Table 1. (Continued)
Population group

Nectar

Zuni

Flathead

Tewa

Cactus

Fir

Koa

Maple

Redwood

Cedar

Ailinginae*
Ailinglaplap

—
168

—

—
71

—
—

—
—

—
179

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

Bikini community”

182

—

—

—

183

—

101

—

Enewetak community*

112

31

59

Ailuk
Arno
Aur
Ebon

Jaluit

—
—
—

98
—
—

—
91
84

182

—

—

—

126
126
—

84
—
126

154

Majuro
Maloelap
Meyjit Island

—
—
—

Mili

70

182

Kwajalein

Lae
Lib Island
Likiep

—

76

—
—
—

—
—
—

—

—

25

84
161
158
189

60
63
—

—
—
—

—
—
174

197
192
—

—
—
—

104
91
98

—
—
—

98
67
104°

—
—
—

—
—
—

188
185
76

—

101

—

—
—
—

—
—
101

101
101
—

—
—

160
157
84

—
—
—

101
101
102

—
—
17

102

17

—

—

—

—

104°

—

—

76

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

154

126

140

—

—

76

—

—

—

—

—

98

—

Utrik community

Wotho
Wotje

112

70

92

energy expenditure, and body surface area (ICRP 2002).
For the ages younger than adult, we found that the age
dependence of body surface area to be most similar to the
age dependenceof the reported bioassay data.
Ourinterpretation of body surface area as a surrogate
index for scaling adult intakes to younger age groups is
related to the concept that particulate contamination of the
face and hands (whose area can be considered to be a

constant fraction of the body surface at each age) was a
major contributor to internal contamination. This would be
particularly true for children, for whom hand to mouth
contact is frequent. The age-dependent acute intakes, relative to adults, selected in this study are presented in Table 2.
For the youngest age group (<1 y), we assumedthat
there are two sources of intake: the consumption of mother’s breast milk and the ingestion of fallout particles. The
intake of a given radionuclide via mother’s breast milk is
the product of the mother’s radionuclide intake, the fraction
of the activity of each nuclide ingested by the motherthatis
transferred to breast milk (F,,,,), and the consumption rate of
breast milk by the infant. We discuss the derivation of these

—

—

—
—

—

—

92

—

—
—
—

—

—

42

—
—
—

—

60

101

—

101
101
101

Rongelap Island
community*
Rongerik®

84

91

—
—
—

—
—
—

—

119

165

—
—
—

—

—

,

—

—

63

182
154
—

Ujae

—

101

—

Namorik
Namu
Rongelap control

group*

126

—
—
—

—

—

176

—
—
—

—

189

—

—

—
101
101

105

—

—

—
—
—

76

84

70

—
—
—

—

—

—

—

101

—

101

—

—

—

101

—

—
17

—

factors in a later section. In addition to the intake of
radionuclides via breast milk, we assumed infants (O-1 y of

age) had direct ingestion of fallout equal to 10% of the adult

intake (Table 2), since the body surface area of the infant is
about 10% of that of the adult (CRP 2002).

Chronic intakes
Chronic intakes of radionuclides that persisted in the
environment for years after fallout deposition were also
assessed. The environmental pathways resulting in chronic
intake are substantially different from those of the acute
Table 2. Assumed age dependence of acute radionuclide intake
relative to adult intake.
Age category (y)

Acute intake relative to adult

<1
1 to <3
3 to <8
8 to <13
13 to <18
=18

0.1 + breastfeeding
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.9
1

Select target paragraph3