exposure to radiation. And so they are being pushed back and back (eadPew until they are ebatinngtmo the stage now whereoe cantfy Se W be measured ma ti IITg TITEw Pp Lem of i TeTs— tL what simply T wou hd TItpaspeect—q z ieeehe " a pak ee eT I Lila ma itt Re | ' [| . d prac gat a Ss haa ha iad or Q I K L iL. trate h n qt Zo ; a J : I e , either epidemiologically orphysically, in a practical wae P ag aeonhr steals > Zs eS aa! aie are teens Ce edi ee eeee ee “ee 5 pao eee = § tC ee pAS@ think that there is a danger of pushing this too far. Because the further back you push the: without, | a being able to prove, in fact, that you are absolutely correcty tam cae. PRS A the more you reinforce the idea that es radiation Ayfrrtuie is dangerous to man, Whereas, 40 and therefore, we must , as you will see from this paper over here, ut4) the review of Pag} IAHBE Rs ‘ene book, that it may turn out MPM, in ten or fifteen yearsa, we must use ¥aivRhYopy-Wi4mean nuclear energy to provide #P WM electricity, and qmmmmEpe—we are not paying enough attention Meow to the engineering of electricity production through nuclear it seems to me, BERGE: is the major problem here. What do you see as the changing attitude? 25 How do you A