exposure to radiation.
And so they are being pushed back and back
(eadPew until they are ebatinngtmo the stage now whereoe cantfy
Se
W
be measured
ma
ti IITg TITEw
Pp
Lem of
i
TeTs—
tL what
simply
T wou hd
TItpaspeect—q
z
ieeehe
"
a
pak
ee eT
I
Lila
ma
itt
Re
|
'
[|
.
d
prac
gat
a
Ss
haa ha
iad
or
Q
I
K
L iL. trate
h
n
qt
Zo
;
a
J
:
I
e
, either epidemiologically orphysically, in a practical wae
P
ag
aeonhr steals >
Zs
eS
aa!
aie
are teens
Ce edi ee eeee ee
“ee
5
pao
eee
=
§ tC
ee pAS@ think that there is a danger of pushing this
too far.
Because the further back you push the:
without,
|
a
being able to prove, in fact, that you are absolutely correcty tam
cae.
PRS
A
the more you reinforce the idea that es radiation Ayfrrtuie
is dangerous to man,
Whereas,
40
and therefore, we must
,
as you will see from this paper over here,
ut4)
the review of
Pag} IAHBE Rs
‘ene book, that it may turn out MPM, in ten or fifteen
yearsa, we must use ¥aivRhYopy-Wi4mean nuclear energy to provide #P
WM electricity, and qmmmmEpe—we are not paying enough attention Meow
to the engineering of electricity production through nuclear
it seems to me,
BERGE:
is the major problem here.
What do you see as the changing attitude?
25
How do you
A