group. Only adenomas(Fig. 7b) did not develop
in persons exposed beyond their teenage years.

6

60

£

2 — 50+

nes

ge
=

Be

Utirik

a
405

mod

Qe 30+

O

£o

Rongelapo

a

DH

Ia
SE 204
~SC

EH = 10+
o

1

o

5

-

0

/

-

og

ow

4

1

a

.

|

20

=
i

4
40

Years Post-Exposure
Fig. &

Relation of thyroid-absorbed dose to time of
development of surgically conformed nodules in
persons who were between 1 and 6 years of age at
the time of exposure on Rongelap and Utirik.

However, there is a marked disparity among the
four graphs for the Rongelap group.
The
occurrence of many adenomatousnodulesin the
younger Rongelap population (Fig. 7a) could have
been a function of either age or high radiation
dose, because the thyroid-absorbed dose was
strongly age-dependent. However, none of the
other three nodule types in the Rongelap exposed
group (Fig. 7b-d) show the same preference for
younger ages, although the number of
observations is quite small. It is possible that the
development of adenomas and occult papillary
carcinomas, as well as overt carcinomas, was
limited by thyroid cell injury resulting from the
high radiation dose to the young Rongelap
population. It is ironic that neoplastic nodules in
the Rongelap group were numerically
overshadowed by benign nonneoplastic lesions.
While one might considerthis to be, in a sense, a

mitigation of radiation injury, the significant
morbidity of benign thyroid nodules in the
exposed Marshallese has been discussed (Adams
et al., 1988).

5) Did benign nodules antedate carcinomas?
A highly significant correlation for time of

development of benign nodules (either total

benign nodules or adenomatous
thyroid cancers was found using
surgery for the specified groups (Ta
r = 0,99 and p = <0.01). This striki
which is present regardless of ageffor the use of
thyroxine suppression, supports the§ notion that a
benign lesion does not evolve into a [malignant one,
nor do carcinomas, presumably poss@ssing a greater
degree of autonomous growth, manifest themselves
clinically any earlier than benign nafules. Ronet
al. (1989) also noted a similarity fin time from
radiation exposure to tumor
fliagnosis for
carcinomas, adenomas, and "noduleq”

6) Was the type of thyroid nodule induced by
radiation a function of dose?
It is thought that at thyroid dosds above 15002000 cGy the incidence of carcinoma
is decreased
due to extensive cell death which Iqaves few cells
capable of becoming neoplastic (NCRP, 1985),
although there are reports of undi
thyroid cancer from external irradiatipbn with thyroid
doses exceeding 3000 cGy (Tuckeretfal., 1991). For
palpable solitary nodules in the gendral population
the usual ratio of benign to maligfant lestons is
about 6:1 and in some radiation-exlosed groupsit
can be as high as 3:1 (DeGrootfet al., 1983),
althoughthe ratio varies considerably depending on
the definitions used. The ratios for the Marshallese
are shown in Table 3, column B.

[In the Utirik

group where the total thyroid doge was relative
small the ratios for persons under 1@fyears of age is
3.5:1 and for those who were older is 3.7:1. The
high benign to malignant tumor rafio of 16:1 for
Rongelap children who were exposed underthe age
of ten years and whose thyroid dosesfexceeded 2000
cGy is consistent with most other sfudies, and the
likely explanation is a decrease in [thyroid cancer
due to extensive cell death or injuryjat the time of
exposure.
What mayalso be important, howpver,is the low
benign to malignant tumor ratio (1)25:1) found in
those Rongelap individuals with mid-range thyroid
radiation doses(i.e., Rongelap indi
age of 10 years at exposure, who
probability in
2000 cGy). Thus, there was a hi
this group of a detected nodule b ng malignant,
whereas there was relatively lo probability of
malignancy in persons whose dose —xceeded 2000

cGy.

This may be relevant in clihical decision-

making for nodules detected in [pther exposed
populations.
21

Select target paragraph3