et
yt ne eae.
A,myfas Bias,
Sdoo

37

The OR denoted the individual tissues, excretions, or physiological processes
involved in the preferential utilization of calcium over strontium, and when

less than 1, expresses such a preference.
rats on a canmercial diet was 0.27.
causing the discrimination.

For example, the Qbpone-diet for

The OR did not imply action by the tissue

Instead, to denote the phystological process of

discriminat fon in a given tissue, the authors utflized the term “StrontiumCalcium Discrimination Factor" (OF).

The product of the DFs equalled the OR.

That strontium was preferentially discriminated against by the placenta

|
I

was found in beagle dogs (AEC Project No. 6, 1958).
'

The ORfetal bone-diet

was 0,3], based upon data from two pups, a value somewhat Jower than the

ORadult bone-diet of 0.4-0.5 of mature beagles (Della Rosa et al., 1972).
The metabolic studies of radiostrontium intensified when its potential
toxicity as a conponent of radioactive fallout was recognized and studies on
its effects began.

The radiobiologfcal significance of strontium metabolism

was discussed in reviews (Thompson, 1960; Loutit, 1962; ICRP, 1972) and

symposia (Lenihan et a}., 1967; Goldman and Bustad, 1972).
Radiobjological Effects

The tumorigenic ability of radiostrontium was recognized jn the 1940s.
Strontium-89 was descrihed as a “producer par excellence of bone tumors” by

Brues et al. (1947), who reported that tumor development tn over 3000 mice was
approximately proportional to dose and to time, with a latent period that

itself was related inversely to dose.

Such a scheme was shown to fit data

that were available for human radtun dtfal painters.

Besides bone turors,

aplastic anenia and myeloid metaplasia were canmon at necropsy (Brues et al.,

1949),

Select target paragraph3