was, as I recall, something like 700 mR as estimated here, and you can see that is quite PLUMBBOB. litigants a conservative These by are Los estimate in general for St. George for the calculations that were actually done for the Alamos. There were St. George and were the litigants. seven individuals who were in Now none of the litigants themselves had film badges as it turned out, but the calculations that Los Alamos did, did fit very nicely within this overall distribution of measurements that were recorded by film badges at St. George. was 10 another example of the validation studies that the actual So that this we did do and did present to the court. ll Any questions? 12 CHAIRMAN MOSELEY: i3 OR. McCLELLAN: Questions for Dr. Anspaugh? I have a couple. Going back into Yook Ng's, it wasn't 14 clear to me why we identified a surrogate mother for the three individuals, 15 and it seems to me you really took pains almost to not identify a typical 16 surrogate mother, but you took an extreme. 17 OR. ANSPAUGH: surrogate was Well, as I recall -- Yook may want to say that -- the taken as a person who was, in fact, there. at the same 19 location at the same time. 20 in order to make these calculations in a proper lifestyle manner; so that 21 in the lack of that particular kind of data, the choice was made to look at 22 the individual females who were at that location at that time, and to use 23 essentially in this 24 didn't have any better data. 25 whole lot of difference because the in utero doses were quite small from 26 the 27 pathway. | 28 DR. McCLELLAN: internal We did not have the data for the actual mother case the highest one. pathway. They That mainly was because we In that particular case it didn't make a were certainly dominated by the external Was an attempt made to reconstruct the dose to the 46