actual mother from the external? DR. ANSPAUGH: Not to the actual mother. MR. HENDERSON: Am I wrong on that, Dick? Richard Henderson from Los Alamos. As you pointed out, we had no information regarding the actual mother, and we picked -since we are not as closely tied to location, we took a lifestyle that was descr ibed by one of the litigants as being typical of a mother at that time — and used that kind of information, what her habits were as far as being inside and outside the house. We did use the house that was described by the litigant...Wé-did not go back and say that was the litigant's mother, 10 per se. We also have a surrogate. ll OR. McCLELLAN: —T- was wondering in terms of on the cascade impactor 12 data, roughly how many of those data sets do you have that you have worked 13 through already, and how-many- are_potentially available? 14 DR. ANSPAUGH: Well, I realtycan't give you a hard number, but on the 15 Operations TUMBLER/SNAPPER, UPSHOT/KNOTHOLE, and TEAPOT, there are probably 16 as many of those measurements as there are high volume samplers. 17 estimate there is something like 10-12 locations that actually had these 18 cascade impactors per event for those series. 19 20 21 DR. McCLELLAN: Were they deployed with “@cRigh vol at the same site in each case? . ~ DR. ANSPAUGH: impactor, 23 comparisons between the two data. - 25 there was I think in almost all cases if there was a cascade 22 24 I would DR. McCLELLAN: a high volume sampler, and I have presented some They track surprisingly well. What further have you done on--thatfront in terms of -- 2 26 OR. ANSPAUGH: How well they track? 27 DOR. MCCLELLAN: 28 DR. ANSPAUGH: | — Yes, have you done any further -I haven't done 47 anything more than what I have.