was, as I recall, something like 700 mR as estimated here, and you can see
that
is
quite
PLUMBBOB.
litigants
a
conservative
These
by
are
Los
estimate
in
general
for
St. George
for
the calculations that were actually done for the
Alamos.
There were
St. George and were the litigants.
seven
individuals
who were
in
Now none of the litigants themselves
had film badges as it turned out, but the calculations that Los Alamos did,
did
fit
very
nicely
within
this
overall
distribution
of
measurements that were recorded by film badges at St. George.
was
10
another
example
of
the
validation
studies
that
the
actual
So that this
we did do and did
present to the court.
ll
Any questions?
12
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
i3
OR. McCLELLAN:
Questions for Dr. Anspaugh?
I have a couple.
Going back into Yook Ng's, it wasn't
14
clear to me why we identified a surrogate mother for the three individuals,
15
and it seems to me you really took pains almost to not identify a typical
16
surrogate mother, but you took an extreme.
17
OR. ANSPAUGH:
surrogate
was
Well, as I recall -- Yook may want to say that -- the
taken
as
a
person
who
was,
in
fact,
there. at
the same
19
location at the same time.
20
in order to make these calculations in a proper lifestyle manner; so that
21
in the lack of that particular kind of data, the choice was made to look at
22
the individual females who were at that location at that time, and to use
23
essentially in this
24
didn't have any better data.
25
whole lot of difference because the in utero doses were quite small from
26
the
27
pathway.
|
28
DR.
McCLELLAN:
internal
We did not have the data for the actual mother
case the highest one.
pathway.
They
That mainly was because we
In that particular case it didn't make a
were
certainly
dominated
by
the
external
Was an attempt made to reconstruct the dose to the
46