correlation are secondary andare not quantified. Based onintensities depicted in Reference 2, the H+1 Land Intensity D+1 Water Intensity (mR/hr) Uncertainty NAN 150 10.5 +50% TARE 50 3.5 +20% Location Oo ra C7 following uncertainties in shine are estimated: BRAVO CHARLIE, DOG, FOX, GEORGE (R/hr) 70 35 +50% HOW 1000 500 ROMEO CHARLIE 1000 70 +80% KOON TARE 500 35 +50% CHARLIE +50% 0.5 30% -DOG 50 3.5 +50% FOX 100 7.0 +50% GEORGE 120 8.4 +20% 25 1.75 450% 0.5 +50% 7.0 +30% HOW UNION NAN YANKEE DOG,South of 100 FOX, GEORGE 200 14 HOW 150 10.5 +50% NAN 100 7.0 +50% FOX 1400 100 +100,-0% +80% For the exposures of each crew, the water intensities are taken to have systematic errors by the stated amounts. Thus, the overall uncertainties in shine dose are calculated with all highsided and all low-sided intensities used in series for the upper and lowerlimits, respectively, of the total shine dose. 84