NAME:
2115

throughout the life span of the population,

2116

can

2117

upon,

2118

lifetime

go

27319

back

and

are

is between
of

That

2121

above birth,
So,

many

of

to the

that

them

doses

assuming they

that we

both agree

.99 added cases of cancer in the

population.

assumes

indeed,

exposed

.15 and

that

2120

2122

90

PAGE

HAP 133080

these

are

|
people

going

go

back

back

at

at ages

birth,

and

considerably

although I wouldn’t want to guess their age.

therefore,

the risk they would assume in their

2123

lifespan is

2124

fraction of a case of cancer in the lifetime of the

2125

population,

against the other kinds of risks one would

2126

quantify

their

less

by

than

not

this.

So

One

2129

and two associated with water,

associated with the

engineers,

here,

when you are

2132

maybe

is

one

of

talking

the

about

smallest

an aspect of moving dirt,

in the lagoon.

People are exposed to risks.

2131

about a

there have been three deaths.

2128

2130

talking

going.

So far in the clean-ups,

2127

you are

I think the radiation risk
a small

fraction of

a case,

considerations.

2133

Mr.

YATES.

Will

2134

Dr.

BRILL.

These risk estimates are based upon the

experience

2136

followed now for over 30 years.

2137

estimates.

2138

come

These

of

are

the

know until

2135

2139

largely

we

not

Japanese

those

20

or

25 years

survivers

we

go by?

have

So they are rather stable
that

a single

committee

has

up with.

They happen to

agree

very

well with the

United Nations’

Select target paragraph3