NAME: HAP133080 -~ 2090 reviewing 209% standpoint, 2092 2093 Then of radiation effects, the two Over the 2095 13972, 2096 as a the of these years, risk result 2097 from the 89 genetic and I with the Somatics Committee. committees and come to a consensus. 2094 he PAGE of I would to revise last BEIR Committee report ain | since estimates the got together the have recent submit that decreased by a factor of two reappraisal. perhaps the EPA and other groups 2098 looked at the radiation doses and potential consequences, 2099 maybe 2100 resettlement and clean-up, 2101 higher in risk. 2102 three, So 2103 the 2104 lowe four, five, they Might want levels than they have they had 10 to years ago when they planned the were looking at a factor of two reconsider been able to the achieve, risks associated with which are much anticipated. The second thing is that the newest BEIR Committee, 2105 2106 reappraisal, 2107 model, 2108 from, 2109 risks; 2110 falls 271141 most consistent with radiobiological evidence. 2112 developed two models, which is the that one all our in its one which is the linear high-risk estimates come which was put forth as the upper limit on credible and a lower-risk model, in between So I think the high and that was the the called linear quadratic, low models, the and also is best estimates. 2113 look 2714 estimates in terms of the numbers of added cancers at the situation fox the Enjebi population, which the I£ you risk