NAME: HAP 133080 861 Mil. | | MURTHA. PAGE Let me understand what $62 did 663 do an additional detailed assessment, 864 levels of radiation, an initial assessment. 865 Mx. WEISGALL. 866 Mr. MURTHA. Then after you 37 a@re they were saying. forced is that accurate? That is correct. If it hadn't been for the lawsuit, they would not have found these higher levels of radiation, 868 that accurate? Mr. WEISGALL. 870 was 871 lawsuit was brought that 872 Mr. 873 response Well, there there were were brought. MURTHA. to the lawsuit. 875 Mr. 877 That was signs held on, in limbo 879 continue 880 thorough comprehensive 881 safe. with the 882 Mr. MURTHA. 883 Mr. WEISGALL. 684 . 885 but for the the it a not safe the the government acted in three- resettlement of or There were four-month period. which said in essence, Bikini until you radiological survey to see don't conduct a if it was Was there a decision in the lawsuit? Pursuant to the settlement in the lawsuit, thorough radiological was lawsuit resettlement was continued. Then the lawsuit was brought, 878 That was why That is generally correct. early the not on their own initiative. Is that what you are saying? trouble before is | The question is, WEISGALL. signs problems. 874 876 to they found the higher 867 869 They and survey was resettlement was conducted. stopped. That showed