NAME:
HAP 133080
861
Mil.
|
|
MURTHA.
PAGE
Let me
understand what
$62
did
663
do an additional detailed assessment,
864
levels of radiation,
an initial
assessment.
865
Mx.
WEISGALL.
866
Mr.
MURTHA.
Then after
you
37
a@re
they were
saying.
forced
is that accurate?
That is correct.
If it hadn't been for the lawsuit,
they
would not have found these higher levels of radiation,
868
that accurate?
Mr.
WEISGALL.
870
was
871
lawsuit was
brought that
872
Mr.
873
response
Well,
there
there
were
were
brought.
MURTHA.
to the lawsuit.
875
Mr.
877
That was
signs
held
on,
in limbo
879
continue
880
thorough comprehensive
881
safe.
with the
882
Mr.
MURTHA.
883
Mr.
WEISGALL.
684
. 885
but
for
the
the
it
a
not safe
the
the government acted in
three-
resettlement of
or
There were
four-month period.
which said in essence,
Bikini until you
radiological
survey to
see
don't
conduct a
if
it was
Was there a decision in the lawsuit?
Pursuant to the settlement in the lawsuit,
thorough radiological
was
lawsuit
resettlement was continued.
Then the lawsuit was brought,
878
That was why
That is generally correct.
early
the
not on their own initiative.
Is that what you are saying?
trouble
before
is
|
The question is,
WEISGALL.
signs
problems.
874
876
to
they found the higher
867
869
They
and
survey was
resettlement was
conducted.
stopped.
That showed