:: See above. See above. Response to Question 12 The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report did not calculate separate doses for children and adults. Response to Question 13 The DOE-1982 booklet made no statement about Rongelap or any island in the Marshall Islands being safe or unsafe. Response to Question a. b. c. Not all radiation issues were addressed in the DOE-1982 booklet. The DOE-1982 booklet did not address radiation doses already received by the Marshallese nor the potential health effects that might have resulted therefrom. The authors of the DOE-1982 booklet were asked only to communicate the results of the 1978 survey, which were reported in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982. Response to Question a. i b. c. d. b. 15 When the information in the DOE-1982 booklet was presented to the Marshallese government officials and representatives from the northern islands at Majuro in December 1982, the representatives from Rongelap expressed concern about past exposures to radiation. I do not have information about what was done. In the spring of 1983, DOE officials and scientists from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and others visited all of the populated northern Marshall Islands to exglain the DOE-1982 booklet. Because of other commitments, none of the authors were able to participate. I do not-believe I have any documents, letters, memoranda or other materials which address this matter. Response to Question a. 14 16 I did not perform a detailed assessment of the Kohn Report. I commented only on those points that dealt with the DOE-1982 booklet. I do not believe Dr. Kohn understood the purpose of the DOE-1982 booklet. His report purported to be a review of the DOE-1982 booklet when, in fact, it appeared to be a review of the work of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory team and Report UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982. 8