Response to Question 9 a. b. co d. e. f. 9* Neither I nor the other authors were aware of exposures to plutonium that included high readings. It was not the purpose of the DOE-1982 booklet to report any medical We were condition or to report on any past exposures to radiation. asked only to communicate information about potential future exposures to radiation. Not applicable. See a and b above. To the best of my recollection, I did not attend a meeting with Brookhaven scientists or medical staff in which the Brookhaven staff reported high doses of plutonium in urine of Rongelap citizens. We did not have information about plutonium in urine. We were asked to communicate radiation dose information that was reported in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982. I do not know whether or how data on plutonium in urine might have been provided to the Rongelap people. Response to Question 10 a,b,c. In ~re~arinq the DOE-1982 booklet, we did not have estimates of radiation doses for any individual Rongelap citizen. Our task was to communicate information on the dose estimates projected for the next 30 years contained in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982. d. Neither I nor the other authors of the DOE-1982 booklet prepared dose estimates. The dose estimates were prepared by the authors of the Lawrence e. Livermore National Laboratory Reportf UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982. The. authors of the DOE-1982 booklet prepared the cancer projections f. using doses from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982 and risk factors from the 1982 National Academy of Sciences BEIR III report. Not applicable. ~“ . The authors of the DOE-1982 booklet prepared projections of health defects at birth using doses from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982 and risk factors from the 1982 National Academy of Sciences BEIR 111 report. Not applicable. i. Response to Question 11 Some of the values reported in the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-52853 Pt. 4, September 30, 1982, exceeded U.S. guidelines. They were included in the DOE-1982 booklet. Examples are on page 39 in reference to Naen, Namen and Melu Islands. 7