--

\

\

"bad faith” but the other side will see only a just recovery of their former
position,
Treaties of alliance have had a decidedly spotty record,

Since the possible

effect of an alliance is to draw a third party into a war which is not of his
doing, the strain on the treaty is very great unless both allies fecl at the time
that they are equally threatened.

It seems too much to expect that a nation

which has no interest in the outcome of a war will risk its very life merely to
fulfill a promise contained in a treaty of alliance,

It may well do so if the
Qi hia.

risk of losing is not very great, but one should not expertthis if the odds are
fs

f

clearly against victory.

e
'

\

_t

Where conditions have changed radically and unobeosediy Since a treaty was
Signed, a nation which suffers real injury by such change will on occasion refuse
to be bound by its promises,

While it is true that under international law the

injured state is not justified in doing so without the acquiescenc> of the other
side, nevertheless the absence of any disintcrested method of enforcing treaty
changes to accord with changes in surrounding circumstances can cause great
hardship and will sometimes induce the injured party to take things into its own
hands.

In these cases it usually happens that the nation opposing any change

will raise aloft the banner of

pacta sunt servanda

as the basic norm of all

international relations, yet to the other side it will seem that insistence upon
‘the letter of the treaty is merely black reaction dressed up in the white garments
of morality.

.

Efforts to limit armaments by treaty have certainly not enjoyed a brilliant
success,

On the other hand, it cannot be said that they have wniformly failed.

The more recent criticism levelled against the Washington Treaty for the
Linitation of Naval Armament of 1922 was not that it was ineffective but that it
was So largely observed.

One lesson seems clear and that is that not much can be

expected from attempts at limitation of armament which are not closely tied in
with the international political pattern of the times or which go counter to the

Select target paragraph3