Five samrles were obtained sequentially from 15 persons durinz the

January 1979 field trip to determine the variability inherent in the 24 hour
urine sample program.

The results of this study are listed in Table 7.

For

13% 65, the mean biological and counting variability (one standard deviation)
associated with a single urine sample is 32%.

For 906. most of the results

were less than the minimum detection limits of the system or the average of the

5 urine sample results had an associated standard deviation which was larger
than the result.

Consequently, only 6 sample results were used to determine the

biological and counting variability of the 706, urine data.
deviation associated with this result is 65%.

The mean standard

The counting error contributes

15% of the variability while other sources of variation account for 50%.

These

ether sources are most likely related to the day to day metabolic changes normaliy exhibited by an individual.

B.

Whole-Body Counting
Whole-body counting measurements on the Bikini population that were

conducted in 1974,

1977,

1978,

1979 and 1980 are presented.

The body burden mea-

surements were performed by two different organizations; consequently, the experimental design included a mechanism to ensure that previous and current resuits
are directly comparable.

Key detection components were duplicated and the sys-

tems were calibrated in the same manner (CO 63).

The operational procedures and

counting geometries were basically similar, and an intercomparison study was
conducted using Marshallese and Brookhaven personnel to ensure system
comparability.
1.

Instrumentation
The detector chosen for field use by both Brookhaven organizations

is a 28 cm diameter, 10 cm thick, sodium iodide thallium activated scintillation

Select target paragraph3