University of California, Berkeley, California.

Two civiliang

partici-

pated; their functions are not established by the test litlerature.
other UC organizations, LASL and UCRL, had major roles, a
stitution had a smaller role.

Perhaps these individuals

Two

Scripps Inre related

to the laboratory or Scripps activities or were liaison peabple.

No ex-

posure was recorded for either.
University of California, Los Angeles, California.
whom was a Regent of the University.

Two civilifkns, one of

UCLA did some pretesk—

analytical

work for Project 6.2b, and perhaps this was the reason for] attendance.
One received an exposure of less than 0.5 R and the other

pas recorded

zero.

University of Dayton, Ohio.

Fourteen civilians assisted with

craft effects experiments, Project 6.2a.

fhe B-36 air-

Exposures recoral are all

under 0.5 R.
University of L.

One civilian with a low exposure was listed With this

affiliation in the Consolidated List.

Thecomplete identiffication of

the university listed is not given in the source.
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

One civilian with

Jno identi-

fied participation was badged with TG 7.1; no exposure was

Frecorded.

In addition, nine civilians and one military were listed inj

the Con-

solidated List for TG 7.1 without any organizational affiliation.

TASK GROUP 7.2 (ARMY)
No joint defense agency contractors were badged with TG 7.2}
non-DOD Federal agency, the U.S. Coast Guard, was represented bp

but one
one offi-

cer and eight enlisted men who manned the Loran station on EnewBtak Island.
These men did not participate in the test series, but were pres@nt throughout.

Their exposures appear to have been estimates rather thanfactual

readings from the badges each man wore.

407

Select target paragraph3