Team 101, McClellan AFB, California.
One military from this umit was
badged with TG 7.1, and four others were badged with TG 7.4.
This
team was associated with the 1009th Special Reporting Squadron in
Projects 7.1 and 7.4.
The exposure for this individual hag
grouped with the other four Team 101 personnel in the TG 7.
been
section
of Table 86.
Wright Aeronautical Development Center, Wright-Patterson AFB,
civilians and eight military were badged.
io.
WADC participatefi
Three
in Proj-
ects 6.2a and 6.2b, which involved the exposure of B-36 and{B-47 inflight aircraft to weapon effects.
Personnel exposures app ar to be
modest, with one man 0.5 to 1 R and three men receiving 0.0 1 to 0.5 R.
Exposure was probably due to elevated background radiation
5th Air Base Group, Travis AFB, California.
t Enewetak.
One military was baddged with
TG 7.1, but his function in the group is not evident.
1009th Special Weapons Squadron, Hq USAF, Washington, D.C.
Nind
are on the TG 7.1 list from this group, of which one can be
military
Jassociated
with Project 7.1 and three with Project 7.4.
1083rd Special Reporting Squadron, Sandia Base, New Mexico.
Onq@
military
officer from this organization served as an assistant project
officer
on Project 1.2b.
The squadron was apparently for administr
port (e.g., pay, recordkeeping, and leaves) of Air Force per
serving in non-Air-Force organizations.
The officer on Proj
was serving at the Army's Ballistic Research Laboratories.
1090th Special Reporting Group, Sandia Base, New Mexico.
This g
the organization above, was set up to enable Air Force perso
serve in non-Air-Force organizations.
Several of the officegs among
the 42 officers and men of the group can be identified with
as program leaders for AFSWP.
Three of the group were exposdd to over
3.9 R.
389