Naval Unit, Chemical Corps School, Ft. McClellan, Alabama.

Thi unit pro-

vided one officer who worked in the ship contamination studKes activity of Project 6.4.
was 1.950 R

His exposure recorded on the Consolidafked List

(see Table 59).

Office of Naval Research, Washington, D.C.
Project 1.4.

One civilian partickpated in

His exposure is given in Table 59.

Special Weapons Unit, Naval Air Station, San Diego, California.

One offi-

cer from this unit appears on the Consolidated List; he ser¥ed in the
radsafe task unit (TU 7).

TASK GROUP 7.2 (ARMY)
Boat Pool Detachment.

This group, remaining at Enewetak from Oferation

IVY, provided small boat support for the garrison force at

Hnewetak.

Administrative control of the unit appears to have remained
even after the arrival of CTG 7.3 at the PPG.

The unit provided intra-

atoll sealift service for Enewetak in cooperation with the

service provided by the Holmes & Narver (H&N) boat pool.
111 men and 1 officer on the Consolidated List.

ith TG 7.2
all boat

fT is unit has

The exposu

s recorded

are all less than 1 R and were assessed on the basis of the

umber of

tests in which individuals had been involved.

s ranged

The assessme

from 0 R for one individual who participated only in shot N

TAR to

0.800 R for members of the detachment who were considered p

ticipants

in the entire CASTLE series.
TG 7.3 (TU 7.3.8)

The exposure entries are inclu

fed with

in Table 59.

TASK GROUP 7.3 (NAVY)
The personnel exposures from the Consolidated List are precio in
Table 59 for naval units of TG 7.3.

Task Unit 7.3.0 (Special Devices Unit)
The USS Curtiss arrived at Enewetak on 24 January carrying t e special
devices.

The Curtiss, under escort by the USS Estes, departed f r Cali-

fornia at 1530 on 14 May.

During its stay at Enewetak, the Curt, SS
339

was

Select target paragraph3