8452nd AAU, Sandia Base, New Mexico. organization and the one above Thirty-seven military lis (845ist AAU) were apparently tive support units serving U.S. Army personnel in the Armed cial Weapons Project (AFSWP) and the men were probably stati Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL). Personnel of the 8452n@ are cre- dited with participation in Project 6.4. 930lst Test Support Unit, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Se BRL above. 9423rd Test Support Unit, Ft. Myer, Virginia. One military with exposure was badged with TG 7.1, but no particular activity high s been associated with this individual. 9465th TSU (home station unidentified). One military with a low ¢xposure and no identified project activity was badged with TG 7.1. 9471st TSU, Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey. Eight men from this unit ewecuted Project 6.6, which involved offsite ionosondes. Three men we on Rongerik during the BRAVO fallout incident and were assigned expo- sure of 98 R based upon a badge exposed in their tent. recon- A lat struction assigns them 78 R (Reference 68), and this has been fisted in Table 58. 9577th TSU (home station unidentified). One military from this un}t was badged with TG 7.1, but his function has not been identified. TASK GROUP 7.2° (ARMY) Most of the Army personnel in the task force were in this groug. Only a portion of the men in this group were badged, but the list of personnel in Reference 13 closely approximates the total number of persons in) TG 7.2, which leads to the conclusion that most of the readings are the “caficulated estimates" referred to in the introduction to that document (Referefice 13, p. 2) rather than badge readings. The values given for the men andfused in Table 58 are usually rounded to even tenths of roentgens, givinglevidence of ratio taking and rounding off. 330 This was probably done on fhe