evaluation of decontamination techniques;

the exposures were h4gh, as

reflected in the Table 58.
Anti-Aircraft Artillery and Guided Missile
Texas.

(AA&GM) Center, Ft. slids,

Three men from this unit were badged with TG 7.1.

Probably personnel on temporary duty for radsafe

(TU 7).

The
Duri

TG 7.1 recruited from Ft. Bliss (Reference 8, September 1953 I

ment).

No other activity has been associated with these men.

Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, Maryland.
930lst Test Support Unit
Projects 1.2b and 1.8.

(Ordnance)

BRL, supporte

by the

at Aberdeen Proving Ground, staffed

A total of 18 BRL and 930lst TSU person

shown in the Consolidated List of CASTLE Radiological Exposures
erence 13) but only 10 are identified with the projects by name
posures for two exceeded 3.9 R.

Four of the military were Air

Horce

enlisted men, not soldiers, and their exposures are listed inT
under non-Air-Force organizations in TG 7.1.

The exposures for

Army personnel and the civilians from BRL and the 930lst are sh
combined under BRL in Table 58.
Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.

One civilian participant in Prpject

6.5, Decontamination and Protection, was exposed to 2.275 R.
Military District of Washington, Hq.

One officer participated with

Project 2.3 making neutron measurements.

WRL in

His exposure was 2.7 R

Signal Corps Engineering Laboratories (and Evans Signal Laboratory), Ft.
Monmouth, New Jersey.

Eight civilians and eight military partic pated

in Projects 2.1 and 2.2 in gamma dosimetry and in Projects 6.6,
and 7.2 in electromagnetic effects.

1

el,

The latter two projects inv¢ lved

offsite participation; the exposures of the civilian associated ¥ ith

Project 6.6 was 0.200 R.

The gamma dosimetry projects involved

ment recovery in contaminated areas; four persons were exposed tc

3.9 R.

328

struover

Select target paragraph3