Operations:

Sampling devices on F-84, WB-29, and B~-36 airdraft were

used to obtain nuclear debris samples close in to the detomations.
Long-range calibration samples were also collected by WB-29

aircraft.

Aircraft generally did not enter the cloud until 2 hours affter burst;
the clouds were followed for 5 to 7 hours while samples we

obtained.

Collection of close-in particulate samples was

being

Under the

technical direction of LASL, gas sample collection was supa@rvised by
Hq USAF, and gas separation and some analysis was performed by UCRL.
Shots:

All.

Radiation Exposure Potential:

Exposure potential existed fibr aircraft

crews, as well as for those processing samples upon the airpraft's return and those decontaminating the aircraft.
Staffing:

Five people were definitely associated with this]

project,

three from the 1009th (two civilians, one military), one cipilian from
LASL, and one civilian from UCRL.
Table 19.

Their exposures are presPnted in

Exposures for personnel from other task groups,

flotably

TG 7.4, are given in Table 87.
Project Report:

Reference 77.

Cloud Photography (Program 9)
A single project, Project 9.1, made up this program in ordef to determine the rise rate of the cloud and the height at which the clofs ceased
to rise.

Project 9.1 -=- Cloud Photography

Agencies:

Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc.
Lookout Mountain Laboratory (LML)

(EG&G)

1090th USAF Special Reporting Group

Operations:

Technical aerial photography was conducted by

, with

backup ground photography by EG&G in conjunction with its pllotography

work for LASL.

One RB-36 and three C-54 aircraft, each equipped with

two cameras, flew one mission per aircraft for all six shotg.
flights were 40 to 100 nmi

(74 to 185 km)
199

from ground zero.

The

Select target paragraph3