Based on the decontamination data given in Chapters 4 and 5, it appear that different WB-29s served as the heavy nuclide sampler on various sHlots and the shoe boxes were easily moved from one aircraft to another. Th B-36H double-squeegee systems had six compressors pumping into six 9004in (14, 743-cem?) containers at 3,000 lb/in* (211 kg/em?) (Reference 9, An- nex D). The F-84Gs were equipped with a sampling panel mounted atop the magn instrument panel. The sampling panel is Shown in Figure 24. This panq@l contained radiac instruments and indicator lights for each sampling sydtem. The rate meter for the tiptank ion chamber (see Figure 24) had a three Stage scale: 0-1 R/hr, 0-10 R/hr, or 0-100 R/hr. The reading from thi meter was transmitted by the pilot to the sampler control aircraft whe the sampling project manager maintained control of each mission. The top center of the sampling panel had an integrating dosimeter tegron). (—[n- The Integron meter recorded the total cockpit dose in the range of 0-7.5 R with an error of +20 percent during sampling missions (Referf ence 29, Chapter 8 et seq). (JASPER) I4-71/PD RATE METER FOR COCKPIT INTENSITY The IM-71/PD (Jasper) INTEGRON \ WINGTIP TANK SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTROL AND INDICATORS A e —| rate meter measured eo Aa =. GAS SAMPLE SYSTEM INDICATORS \ DOS IMETER RATE METER TO WING TANK SNAP SAMPLER CONTROL SWITCH CONTROL STICK Figure 24. F-84G sampling panel, CASTLE. 138