The 5x8 record cards and the Personnel Exposure Sheets were updated with exposure information (when possible) ter developing and/or reading. as soon as it was availatle af- The 5x8 record cards were used as a@ cur- rent tabulation of personnel exposure. This system was designed tq inform the monitors of the total dose received by any task group member. [Even So, overexposures sometimes occurred because of the time required fbr processing, posting the results, and notifying affected personnel. At the conclusion of CASTLE, the record cards and Personnel Exp@sure Sheets were transferred to CTG 7.1, who was responsible for keeping]|total dose records on the entire task force. For most units where 5x8 redord cards were not used, rosters of shipboard personnel were used to ligt and total all badge readings for each individual. These unit master ligts and the 5x8 record cards were used to develop the Consolidated List of Radiological Exposures (Reference 13), which was used as the basis t the dose tabulations in Chapters 6 through 10. Although the the basis List does not distinguish between exposures determined from film badges a those calculated or assessed, these data are often obtainable from the 5x8 record cards or the Personnel Exposure Sheets. In the process of accumulating the names for the Consolidated Li some badges with zero readings were ignored. Therefore, a badged individ- ual who had only zero readings may not appear on the Consolidated Ligt. This practice was not uniform, but a cursory examination of the micr record (Reference 87) ilm that contains the Personnel Exposure Sheets, t 5x8 cards, and the rosters of shipboard personnel reveals that men with bhdges issued at the Enewetak airfield with zero readings do not appear on the Consolidated List unless, of course, they were issued another badge a another time that did indicate exposure. The extent of this is diffigult to judge without examining all the microfilmed records. TS 7.4 Personnel of (Air Force) were primarily affected, and the Consolidated List at Kwajalein also ignored zero readings in cumulating badged personnel]. This has no significance for assessing the total radiological exposur 104 wa ere tees + roneously indicates that less than half were badged; the Naval Air St