Flight deck crew of the Bairoko
@

Entire crew of the USS Philip

@®

"Certain individuals," 40 in all, whose names werelto
be forwarded to joint task force headquarters at a
later date.

Nine days later, on 21 March, CJTF 7 sent a message from

ewetak to

the Chief, AEC Division of Military Applications, CINCPAC, an

the Army

Chief of Staff, who was the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Executive

gent for

CASTLE, stating that he was acting on the advice "from my staff surgeon,

radiological safety advisors, and scientific director" and was accepting
the request for a waiver of MPE for the groups CTG 7.3 listed.

He also

concurred that these individuals should be assigned "to activi ies requiring minimum or no exposure."
As the operation progressed, more waivers were requested.
der, TG 7.4 wrote

(Reference 24, p.

The Comman~

72):

The present maximum exposure of 3.9 r per l3-week test
period is not a realistic MPE in consideration of heavy
work loads in extensively contaminated areas.
The use £
waivers to cover exposures in excess of this MPE become
a needless routine without much significance when opera

tions are conducted in large contamination areas withou
much interval between detonations. A large number of i
dividuals did exceed 3.9 r, but very few exceeded 6.0.

TG 7.1 noted in the final radsafe report that the requireme

s of the

military projects to work in contaminated areas and with contami ated
equipment soon led to block requests for an authorized exposure

£ 7.8 R

for the test series.

reated a

The waiver of the MPE early in the series

loss of confidence in the established limit of 3.9 R, which was

oon re~

flected in the actions of the nonmilitary task groups.

ecame

When it

apparent that an MPE waiver could be obtained upon application,

he prac~

tices of conservation of exposure and wide utilization of recovegy and
contractor personnel became minimal.

In many cases, waivers wer

re-

quested after overexposure, and in others approved waivers were

ver

utilized.

33 per-

Although 10.8 percent of TG 7.1 exceeded the MPE, onl

cent of the overexposures were covered by waivers, and 22 percen
99

of the

Select target paragraph3