Table 9. Body weights of Marshallese adult males in kilograms.*
_

Standard
9

_

Utirik

|

69

12.9

54.5
52

Bikini

50

. 72

11.7

Rongelap

87

63

9.4

Enewetakb

130

71

Maxim

Minimum

deviation

Mean

Number

Atoll

92.
100

86.

47.5

126

37

14

126
37
—
69¢
276
Total
a Conard et al. (1958, 1959, 1960, 1963, 1975); Mittenberger et al. (1980b); McCraw (1980).
b Personal communications, E.T. Lessard and R. Miltenberger, Brookhaven National Laboratory,

¢

Upton, NY (1979).
Weighted mean.

listed as 110 d in ICRP (1979,
(1977). This is consistent with
BNL on the half-time of
compartment in Marshallese

1990) and NCRP
data obtained by
the long-term
(Miltenberger et

al., 1981; Miltenberger and Lessard, 1987).

because it is based on a much lar

population and the difference betw
115-d_ half-life observed in 23
males is minimal. The half-time i

term compartment for 21 females i
study was 83 d (range 63-126 d).
madea separate calculation based on

A

summary of BNL data presented in Figure 4
shows that the distribution of biological halflife in 23 Marshallese adult males can be
considered lognormal with a median of 115 d, a
mean of 119 d, and a range of 76-178 d. In our dose
model for 137Cs, we used the 110-d haif-life
200 r

biological half-life and the smaller
for females. These two parameters

to a degree, and the dose to femal
somewhatless than the males.

T

T

T

1 200

175 +
s
2

=
a
=

150 F
r

bs

125 a
pe

8 100 -

®

3

F
}

| 100

2 6
r

4 90

50 F:
a5 t

0.1

4 80
t

5

an

34.4

|

50

1

66.6

L

95

99.9

70

Cumulative probability (%)

Figure 4. Probability plot of the biological half-life for 137Cs in Marshallese males.
27

offsetting
would be

Select target paragraph3