"itnenaneetaanttsnail
nes
jt
[ grmnmoneeemad
Mette
cesennrad
*fFasenny
i nn a
Seca
”
a
Ww
a
>
”
n
uw
fed
a.
a
us
>
°
x
<
iw
a,
10
0)
Se a teeter arte tee
Figure 3.1
Ground
FROM GROUND ZERO
(K FT.)
ace presssure versus distance,
IC
Shot l.
Shot 2 was that of overstress fepressure capsule tecause of a
greater yield than expected.
ough the yield was less
than Shot l,
the gages apparently received greater fabceleration, judzing from the
high frequency oscillation on the rec rpis and the facts that some of
the gages stopped when hit by the sho¢ly
glass recording dicxs was broken.
Iti
and, also, thas one of the
is popaite the =ost of this
was due to using the same mounts, which mayhaile been sraken loose by
Shot
3.2.3
l.
|
i
Bo
Presentation of Data
geod
hose
ss,
4
The station numbers, distances, arrival ti day \e‘aration of
positive phase, and peak overpressure, where obta Hep are listed in
Table 3.2.
3.2.
A curve of pressure versus distance ip ‘plotted in Figure
The points plotted are averages of readings from each station.
Arrival times versus distance from ground zero are listed in Table
28