COMPUTATION OF TOTAL TRU ACTIVITY REMOVED FROM THE
HUSTEAD AREA OF ISLAND SALLY
DOE/ERSP TECH NOTENO.10.1

DATED: 28 July 1978

AUTHOR: M. G. Barnes, DRI

The total activity removed from the Hustead area was computed using TRU values computed from
IMP survey readings taken before and after soil excision. Soil gradient models were fitted
separately to the portion having subsurface contamination exceeding 80 pCi/g TRU, and to the
remainder of the area.
Soil profile data for the area without subsurface contamination are shown in Figure B-10-5. The
gradient is exponential, with before excision average of 64.7 pCi/g TRU, and after excision average
21.5 pCi/g TRU. Then, using the notation of Tech Note 10.0,
k

= 64.7

ky = 21.5

ky _= 0,332
—
k
1

ed

= 0.907

The average TRU concentration in the soil removed was therefore
64.7 x 0.907(1-0.332)

=

39.2 pCi/g TRU.

The total volume of soil excised from this section was 460 cubic yards, so the total activity removed
was

Soil profile data for the area with subsurface contamination are shown in Figure B-10-6. The
gradient rises to a peak at 20 cm and drops off exponentially below 20 em. The rise was modelled as
linear, since not enough data are available to fit any other model. It was assumed that the IMP
readings after the first lift represent the peak concentration, and the total excision depth was 40 em
(2 lifts). Then the average concentration in soil removed was
0.5(56.8

+ 86.5)

+ 0.5(86.5

roy

39.2 x 460 x 1.185 x 10-6 = 0.02 Ci.

x 1.1371(1-0.4150)) = 64.6 pCi/g TRU.

The volume of soil removed from this section was 740 cubic yards, so the total activity removed was

64.6 x 740 x 1.185 x 10-6 = 0.06 Ci.
The total activity removed from the Hustead area,* as calculated by these methods, would be:
0.02 Ci + 0.06 Ci = 0.08 Ci.

were om

*See Editor's Note on page B-10-4.

B-10-9

Select target paragraph3