area was a strip approximately 1.5 m wide and 65 m long parallel to the east beach line while the other was approximately a 15 x 8-m rectangle located on the northwest beach line of Kickapoo. These boundaries were deterrnined using portable instruments. A beach rock sample was collected and analyzed which verified that the ratio had not changed. Some data in these areas still indicate high TRU concentrations even after a diligent effort was made to remove the TRU activity, including hand sweeping and washing with high pressure water. After an attempt to serape the activity from a piece of coral from one of these areas failed, it was determined the contamination left was fixed and the surface soil criteria no longer applied. In addition to this "Kickapoo hot strip" problem, small pieces of contaminated metal fragments still remain along the beach and are continually washed ashore. Periodic efforts were made to pick up these pieces of metal but more are likely to continue to wash ashore. The total TRU activity removed from the Kickapoo area was estimated to be 0.85 curies based on final data with 4207 eubie meters (5503 cubie yards) of soil removed. The method for calculating activity removed is shown in Tech Note 10.0. The second area where soil removal occurred was Yuma. IMP measurements were taken on a fine grid of 25 m, along with some at 12.5-m, in March 1978. Additional surface soil samples were eollected to check the ratio of 3.37 which was not verified. After analysis of the data, the new ratio computed was 5.31 + 0.20 with this ratio being consistent throughout the cleanup of Yuma. Like the cleanup of Kickapoo, a debris/brush removal occurred before any soil lifts were taken and the area was measured by the IMP on a 12.5 m grid with the detector at half-mast. Two distinet lifts were made following this debris/brush removal, apparently based on the boundaries first drawn on the 50 m grid data, with the second lift overlapping the first in some places. These lifts did not encompass the whole area that was initially estimated to be over 40 pCi/g. IMP measurements were taken after each of these two lifts in April and May 1978 along with subsurface soil samples collected in these areas. Cleanup boundaries had been based on 40 pCi/g average TRU activity up to this point but it was decided to clean up only the areas with TRU activity greater than 80 pCi/g. Using this criterion, new boundaries were drawn on the IMP data and subsurface data were collected after the first two lifts to indicate surface and subsurface TRU contamination greater than 80 pCi/g. After the third lift was complete, the area was measured by the IMP in June 1978 with the data showing a fourth lift was necessary to get below 80 pCi/g. After the completion of this lift, IMP measurements were taken in July 1978. These results indicated all 0.25 hectare average TRU to be less than 80 pCi/g, though not less than 40 pCi/g. To achieve the 40 pCi/g level, only one small area would have to be removed. Following the excavation of this area, more data were taken around the area whichstill showed TRU concentrations greater than 40 pCi/g, thus another lift was done. IMP measurements collected following this lift showed no 0.25 heetare average TRU activity greater than 40 pCi/g. The final estimate of TRU activity removed from the Yuma site is 0.28 curies and the estimated cubic meters removed is 2523 (3330 cubie yards). This area is not in the same radiological condition as it was immediately following the soil removal. A PACE restoration effort that was undertaken later in the project changed the appearance and the radiological condition of this area. The third area on Sally requiring soil removal was Hustead. Some fine grid IMP measurements were taken in February 1978 with additional IMP data collected in May 1978. No soil samples had been collected in this area for characterization but in March and May of 1978, surface and subsurface soil samples were collected. A ratio of 5.16 + 0.22 was computed for this area and boundaries were drawn showing the surface and subsurface areas with TRU activity greater than 80 pCi/g. Following the first lift, the area was measured by the IMP and the results indicated another lift was necessary to get the TRU activity below 80 pCi/g. After the completion of this second lift, the area was measured by the IMP with the original results indicating no 0.25 hectare average TRU greater than 40 pCi/g. Based on the final data though, the highest 0.25 hectare average TRU was 330