1.0
0.9
WITHOUT
COLLIMATOR

RELATIVE RESPONSE

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
WITH
COLLIMATOR

0.4
03
0.2
0.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

ANGLE 6 (DEGREES)
FIGURE 3-7. RELATIVE RESPONSE OF THE HPGe DETECTOR FOR 662 keV GAMMA RAYS
AS A FUNCTION OF INCIDENT ANGLE (ZERO DEGREES BEING DIRECTLY
BELOW THE DETECTOR).

Conversion factors are given in Table 3-4 for 137Cs as a function of source depth distribution. Also

shown in Table 3-4 are conversion factors relating external exposure rate (in,R/h at 1 meter) to
photopeak count rate. The exposure rate conversion factors were obtained from data (Beck, et al

1968, 1972) which relate exposure rate at 1 meter to source distribution in the ground for a variety

of radionuclides.

It can be seen that, although a knowledge of the source depth distribution can be

very critical in determining concentration values, it is not nearly so critical for determining
exposure rate values.

For the post-cleanup dose assessment, external exposure rate values for 137Cs were obtained using a
conversion factor of 3.6 .R/h per eps. Conversion factors used for 59Co were 20.5 uR/n per eps for

the 1173 keV peak and 22.3 yp R/h per cps for the 1333 keV peak. In principle, either peak could be
used to determine the total external exposure rate due to 60Co. Both should lead to the same
result. In practice, however, some measurements showed a slight difference in the two results. in
these cases the average value was used.

Table 3-5 shows the post-cleanup island average values for !37Cs and 69Co exposure rate from the
IMP data. Also shown for comparison are the values obtained in November 1972 from the aerial

survey (see Section 3-1).

For comparison, the aerial data have been corrected for radioactive decay

to November 1978. The two sets of data agree fairly well except in the obvious cases where cleanup
activities have reduced the levels. It should be noted that the island average values for the aerial

survey data were estimated from exposure rate contours while those for the IMP were obtained by

numerically averaging discrete data points.

The island average values for 187Cg exposure rate given in Table 3-5 can be converted to island

ayerage concentration values using the data given in Table 3-4. Although the depth distribution for
Cs ean vary significantly from point to point, the profile data obtained in 1972 showed that a
reasonable compromise for all the northern islands would be to take an average of the values given
for a 10 cm and a 15 em relaxation length.

Table 3-6 gives the results for the 0-15 em average

concentration based on a conversion factor of 5.4 pCi/g per cps. Shown for comparison are the
results obtained from the 1979 Fission Product Data Base sampling program. The results, in
general, agree quite well.
10]

Select target paragraph3