3. MON: I am not going to argua against it. i" It seens to me actually a mach more fascinating problem than finding what the human hasard isa. Isis just that if one is trying te put thease into words this is the set of words which doen't exist in the sampling program and If think that they belong thers. LIBS: I think that we all agree there, but there may still be some who still wonder why we study Strontius on a worldwide basis. I hope eur presentation in the last two days helped to answer this question. It would seen that you might well say take the Americans as being the fair exarple, but our problems of worldwide circulation are obviously so serious and so ixportant that I think any —thing less than a worldwide assay or an assay that doean't have acae samples spread all ever the world will be unsatisfactory. We do not know whether Strontium goes with the ordinary fission producte; this has to be settled. We have very good reason for supposing that it will not go with them, that there ia a big fractionation and so we have to do an assay. Oh, the third thing is the long Uifetine means that the mixing processes will carry it all over the world, certainly in the ataesphere and very probably in the ocean currents, at least as far as the su face layers are concerned. any orerer roll in thie. view. S90, 1 don't think isolatienisa has Wa have sot to take a broad point of Return to the original Sabriel question, it wasn't whether you killed Americans: it is whether you kill peeple, and I think that we must assay the world, not owr ow backyard, Are there any people here whe objest to thie or want to discuss it. meet DOE ARCHIVES te sities