3. MON:
I am not going to argua against it.
i"
It seens to me actually a
mach more fascinating problem than finding what the human hasard
isa.
Isis just that if one is trying te put thease into words
this is the set of words which doen't exist in the sampling program
and If think that they belong thers.
LIBS:
I think that we all agree there, but there may still be some who
still wonder why we study Strontius on a worldwide basis.
I hope
eur presentation in the last two days helped to answer this
question.
It would seen that you might well say take the Americans
as being the fair exarple, but our problems of worldwide circulation are obviously so serious and so ixportant that I think any —thing less than a worldwide assay or an assay that doean't have
acae samples spread all ever the world will be unsatisfactory.
We do not know whether Strontium goes with the ordinary fission
producte; this has to be settled.
We have very good reason for
supposing that it will not go with them, that there ia a big
fractionation and so we have to do an assay.
Oh, the third
thing is the long Uifetine means that the mixing processes will
carry it all over the world, certainly in the ataesphere and
very probably in the ocean currents, at least as far as the su
face layers are concerned.
any orerer roll in thie.
view.
S90, 1 don't think isolatienisa has
Wa have sot to take a broad point of
Return to the original Sabriel question, it wasn't whether
you killed Americans: it is whether you kill peeple, and I think
that we must assay the world, not owr ow backyard,
Are there
any people here whe objest to thie or want to discuss it.
meet
DOE ARCHIVES
te
sities