NV/HEG Mtg.-Sept. 26-27, 1968 Bureau records. Page 10 It was decided however to defer further action pending the receipt of additional information utilizing existing LRL and DASA techniques and records. VIII. COMMENTS OF PILOT LIGHT EVALUATION DRAFT It was pointed out that the bomb planned for detonation has other Mods available and that Mod 3 should be considered for the PILOT LIGHT exercise to more reliably insure a limitation in yield and avoid renew- ing reservoirs which had been suggested earlier. However, it appears that the yield was chosen in order to get an appropriate height of burst. Apparently the PILOT LIGHT plan does not yet provide for the removal of the wire lead to the AMAC option selector switch GROUND position. Mr. Reed reminded the Group that this wire should be removed or tied to the AIR position to preclude the GROUND option selection and the probability of a resulting flare dud which might present flash blindness and retinal burn problems. The Group was informed that it is planned to preclude the GROUND selection at the aircraft centerline station, the only station to be used, by adding a jumper cable between the connector and existing plugs to open the three lines that control the GROUND function. Additionally, theprobability of an inadvertent surface burst in-a-thousand rather than one-in-two-hundred as previously pet od en oo because of failure of theradar to function has been found to be oneassumed. In connection with other eyeburn hazard probability and the problem of controlling people, an informal recommendation that NVOO consider the Calntaleiee ONDINE, SMEa C7.