-12Table 3.
Comparison of average uc/kg and V in muscle tissue samples with and without goatfish and mullet and with and
without combined samples.
Samples without combined plates
All
specimens
With goatfish and
mullet
9
5
Date
m2
Av.
a
of uc/seg
SS
mv
mn
58
oO
4-15-54
k-22-54
4~25-54
63 Bo
68
2.04
3
11
41
#1.9
h
46
1.9
19
3.8
9
2.8
31
14
25
7-1-54
7-8-54
7-15-54
7-22-54
7-29-54
8-5-54
3
28-54
6-1-54
6-7-54
6-11-54
6-19-54
6-25-54
11
BSRuc/ke
0.057
O.11
5-2
0.057
0.098
0,12
n
AV
21
21
16-54
5-17 19-54%
5-20.
22-5
23
34
4
a
10
12
3
-15,
Without goatfish
and mullet
V.
n
5
4&2
m2
mo
58 Bu
8
#10
10
17
23
h
2.0
209
(«3
41
1.9
93
10
46
1.9
2
19
3.8
1
9
2.8
2.8
2.7
1.5
2
ks
10
3
8
22
1.6
2.8
1.6
130
170
lho
2
4
«4
915
16
12
16
15
10
0.83
1.03
0.34
0.34
0.97
5
6
3}
6
4
§
9
2.42
1.2
ko
209
4
«5
30
0.61
9
2.2
1
5
2
3
0.26
wo
YS YE uc/feg Ve.
#48
62
27
AV.
58
«0.049
0.097
0.12
32
53
£62
9.
8
3
5
1.4
72
2
4
9
1.1
#1107
125
160
31
21.5
97
135
2
45
16
#1
105
158
«(0.8065
3
7
4 0.44
7 O.41
5 0.19
30.41
1 0.22
§2
£67
42
°&2460
3
4
4
3
1
6
0.15
23
43
43
5
hk
1
6
0.24
49
3
6
5
0.25
0.25
9
8
0.22
o.41
9-7-54
14
0.21
5
10-5-54
11
0.091
8
11
0.092
25
8
10
0.092
27
7
11-2-54
25
0.16
ll
25
0.16
99
11
15
0.098
323
9
8-12-54
8-19-54
8
0O.41
72
2