31 j presumably was not the result of a field of gamma radiation. As I say, it was associated with actual material deposited at the site. It is difficult to arrive at a dose biologicall that might have caused this. However, the figure has been se at the upper limit occurs and recovery is possible, is approximately 700 r since the hair did grow in @mthe individuals later. We can presume that the upper limit might have been of the order of 700 r. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. I think it is worthy of note to state that in 10 general the lesions required no spreial treatment of any 11 kind. 12 essentially all cases was entirely satisfactory. 13 in the most severe cases of skin damage, there was no sydemic 14 manifestations that could be attributed to the skin damage, 15 With regard to thé prognosis of the skin lesions, His bawiagnin OfiS2 ame Likes Woe Anctiivcs Also, even here again it is essentially almost anybody's guess. 17 are a number of opinions m 18 say that clinically with fairly large doses of radiation 19 that recovery has been apparently complete, and that we can 20 be optimistic probably about the ultimate fate of these 21 skin lesions. 22 indicating later breakdown in these lesions, 23 changes, 24 and an attitude of watchful waiting. 2 Qenartet a sod ut Healing in 16 ARC _ No so-called specifics were used. this. There I think it is fair to However, because of data in the literature and carcinogenic it is necessary that we retain a guarded prognosis With regard to the skin lesions, I would like to ‘ 32