30
1

differs from previous reports in the literature,

9

be at variance.

but may

This may be explicable on the basis that

these people did have dark skins,

and the darkness of the

4 f-skin obscrued the early response.
With regard to the severity of the lesions in terms
6

of incapacity to the individuals, the lesions in some of

7

these individuals were painful and of sufficient severity

8

that under all ordinary circumstances, these individuals

9

would be admitted probably to the sick list.

10

It was the clinical impression in general that

j

11

these lesions were quite superficial in nature.

88

12

unable to determine whether the explanation for this is on

Es

13

the basis of the totaldose received or whether it may be

se

144]

diweto the energy of radiation, that is, with lower energy

3

16

betas one might expect more “superficial leasions.

16

ARC

We are

In general the severity of the lesions observed

17

correlated well with the amount of fallout presumably

18

encountered by the individuals.

19

had the most severe lesions, the Ilinkila with less fallout

20

and less total dose had the same type of lesions,

21

severe,

22

rapidly.

23

and generally later in appearance,

but less

and healed more

With regard to the loss of hair, again this

24

apparently occurred in areas where material was actually

rimont of Enerty

Historian's Giles

That is the Rongelap people

y

deposited on the scalp.

It was spotty in nature, and

Select target paragraph3