179 1 would be done that way, so that clears that up. 2 has bean thoroughly done, perhaps another look in six months 3 might be adequate, then. 4 | that time interval? 5 Mr. Harris. If that Is that what you had in mind about Within the first year? Yes, that is what I was thinking. 6 This would be onee before their return to their home atoll 7 if that year business holds. 8 DR. DUNHAM: I would urge a photographic record $11if possible of these observations. 10 MR, HARRIS: Yes. f 11 DR. BUGHER: That opthalmologic camera is good if 5S 12} it is used properly. a8 18 portion of the lens, at least. PE 14 : 15 studies of children, and there is also mentioned dental 16 development.. 17 was noticed in Japan was a temporary disturbance of growth 18 rate, but also there have been some interesting dental 19 anomalies which appeared in young people who were irradiated 20 while they had their primary dentition. In other words, 71 is babies or the first years of life. 22 rather interesting dental changes apparently resulting from 8 some degree of damage to the tooth buds of the permanent 2A dentition. ARC It gives a picture of the anterior Now, what do yarfeel about the question of growth ” One of the things tmt was mentimed that CDR. CONARD: that They have shown some What sort of doses were involved therf Meprrtment of Boercy Rik Tos Me /X