178 the National Research Council Cataract Committee. There is one floating around in this country now, and I am sure it could be borrowed any time resurvey is indicated. CDR. CRONKITE: The original examination was an opthalmatopic examimtion. CDR, ETTER: Sinsky contends that it is only through a slit lamp that you can pick up the early changes. “DR. BUGHER: Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. MR. HARRIS: There is no question. Since this interpretation is so 10 important here, might it be reasonable that on a succeeding 11 examination if Sinsky did it, that Lowy and Sinsky go 12 together and do it, so that he would have Lowry's background 13 from a previous examination? 14 necessary resurvey immediately. 15 hold off a year or so. 16 DR. BUGHER: 17 CDR, CRONKITE: 18 Yes, Perhaps this would not mean a that makes the further opthalmoscopic survey fa a few months. DR, BUGHER: 20 base examination has been made. 21 DR. DUNHAM: 23 ARC very good sense t0 me. The general consensus is to delay 19 22 In other words, you could There is the point here that the There is some question as to whether it was made by the slit lamp or not. CDR. CRONKITE: Lt. Sharp was thére at the time and says it was. 25 Doncptmnnt of DR. BUGHER: Before it was done, we undersood it })'