Me. W. Th. Stanley [ would interpret the tase tlarry's letter to indfeate that thit elther we pay BNL per diem of T.T. personnel, Par as Io PageTau sentenee of che secoud paragraph of John Lawman had issued an ultimatum rates of we will uot have the services am concerned, S they ure worth every cent of it but,per our previous discusstons,T wht it enpt— ing to utillze these rates would present sone problems for you in relation to T.T. finanee and with, OM / One f LT hate to keep dropping these tharny problems on vou, but they seen to keep acising and you are the only person LT can turn to for resolutten. Towant to thank you again for your role as mediator in our recent conYerences. Toam afrald chat without your help they would have been much more unproductive than they were. IL have an appointment to discuss rmruy af the recent survey problems with Walter Weyzen in Washington next Monday and will inform him of the cructal rele you played in calming the waters. A relation to this per diem thing, I would appreciate your thoughts on it and wilh be delizhted to move in whatever direction you feel is indicated. Warm regards, Hugh S. Pratt, M.D. od CY 505 Tad bva