h. Development of retarded fall devieocs (USAF and USN). _i. ‘ Environmental testing of complete weapons (USA, USN and USAF ). jo Compatibility of Mark 7 to F3H (USN). k. Compatibility of Mark 7 to F84-G (USAF). . 1. Compatibility of IX-13 to apolicadle service aircraft (USAF “and USN). me , Development of handling equipment for atomic warheads for all tnd “rookets and guided missiles approved by the Department of Defonse for marriage kel @ux atomic warheads (USAF, USN and USA facilities as necessary and coordinated Military Assistance in Special Application Weapons 13, In this category the AEC has utilized the oapabilitios of the military e eae should envision the further use of military assistance on weapons such as an atomic depth charge, atomic torpedo, or o 16" atomic projectile. It is appa- ront that the military has built up considcrably more experience in these It is interesting to | | Ces of weapons than any existing civilian contractor. Lane eae C) bee Se EMER RT in developing and producing the penetrating and artillcry-fired woapons, and note that the special purpose weapons now being developed by the military for justification and detailed requirements. mm C ) Cc ) It is probable that other "special purpose" weapons will also be conceived and justified by the military in sufficient technical detail by systems analysis so that a logicalresult would be wee wy” U the AEC resulted from military initiative backed up by comprohensive study, the development of the weapon by the military. Development of spedial purpose weapons by the military will not materially affect the workload of civilian AEC contractors, and would augment the over-all devolopment effort applied to atomic weapons. In any case, the military has shown its capability to develop EB projectiles, rockots, penctrating weapons, depth charges, mines, and torpodoes, end others. In event of radically difforent concepts of new "special appli- cations" a military development capability would undoubtedly stem from the h . wach versatility of its experienco and facilities. 14. The designation of a weapon as a special purpose weapon may be difficult in the future, Should the Department of Defense in its systems studies determine the need for and feasibility of a free-falling bomb abies : } 30 - COPIED/DOg IARC