°
,
Future Test Operations" (DASA 79289) concluded that "...the DOD can2-
avions
to conduct endfor suprort the AEC-DOD nuclear test operati
~
bility
can
#
most effectively end economically be achieved by a single DOD organization.
I+ recomended that "This DOD test orgenization should revain its untt
S
Oe wees wee
fox
eT
Yume:
‘b. The 20 August 1959 "Report of the Study Group on Orgentzetion
should assume the function of providing support which is reaulred ofhe
th
seperation, the Test Orgenizetion hecequerters should be located
pre
DOD for nuclear tests at the 1S." and "When not deployed for a test
n osthe
sashington, D. C. area with en office in the AYbuqucrque, New Mexico
This study verert war unproved by the Chairman, AEC and the
ee ee
crea."
Seeretary of Defense on 27 November 1959.
APEEMDIZ A
£ Enclereve bu Ms elds
e
bw ot S ZIT Ate
.° 24 August 1959, J-I Report:
«on ee eae
AK TAN wee
Task Group 7.1 Property items were
ID
concurrent with the .
transferred to AEC by JTF-7 for use by J-Division
termination of the military personnel
BY
in 7.1 and the deactivation of
that group.
25 August 59, J-15 Report:
In this report I believe is the first reference
to the addressing of containment of underground explosions and the calculations By
and computations associated with predicting the proper containment.
in this time period was done by Brownlee, Eilers, and Art Cox.
The work
POUT Smee.
I also recommended that "The SUP-SEVEN
Le et ae a Seat mee
: werdinate command of DASA..."
os
wt5egrity and identity as Joint Tas: Force Seven end shotild be a