exposure was much greater than 650,000 r. ‘There is ne sound explanation for Giscrepancies that eccur in the chemiea) data dertved fren 115.07 enf 113.08, and thus the reliability of the date from 113.04 becones questionable. Tt is felt that the initial exposure data frew 113.03 is reliable since the total expesure was well established an4 the residual estinate was valid. Date frou Stations 113.03, 113,04 end 113.09 agree with results from previous events. 3.8 prscusstor Pehle 5.16 summarises Redwing initial gamma exposure Gata, and Zable 3.17 gives the totel yield, fission yield, and relative air density for each event. Figures 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 are plots ef the “f Redwing initial gamma exposure versus distance end the EM 23-200 curves for siniler tetal yield. This method ef computation neglects the effect of relative fission and fusion contributions te the total yield. Correction factors discussed in Section 2.3.1 have been applied te adjust the raw date to unshielded, betatron-calibrated exposure values. Cherokee data were adjusted to reletive sir density ef 0.995. The initial gama exposure from Cherokee, fhmi, and Navajo at 3 miles was about 1 r. The accuracy ef the initial gama exposure Gata as correctedis within + 50 perent. gr, wow 5 FAC Figures 3.5 through 3.8 show the tetal residual gaume exposures plotted en maps. These exposures are corrected for station shielding and spectral response of the desineters (Section 2.3.2). of the values from In eidition, all «a given shot were adjusted to the sane recovery time